Legal Opinion
Amerada Hess Corp. v. Zurich Insurance
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided May 17, 1999No. Civ. 1997-0035PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FINCH, Judge
This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment.
I. Background
For the purposes of this summary judgment determination, the parties have presented the following factual circumstances.
A. The FCCU Construction Project
In 1991, Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. and its parent Amerada Hess Corp. (collectively "HOVIC" or "Plaintiffs") undertook to construct an addition to HOVIC's existing refinery on St. Croix. The addition, the construction of the Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit ("FCCU"), was a major project involving the use of many subcontractors…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. National Reo Management, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Nickeo v. Atlantic Tele-Network Co.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2003
- In Re Tutu Water Wells Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. Virgin Islands Enterprises, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
- Edmunds v. Wyatt V.I., Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.