Legal Opinion

Antranik Paroutian v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 3, 1967No. 134, Docket 30476PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Circuit Judge:

This is an application by a federal prisoner for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court properly treated the application as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Ray v. United States, 295 F.2d 416 (10th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 875, 82 S.Ct. 1146, 8 L.Ed.2d 278 (1962). We affirm the district court’s denial of the motion.

Appellant was convicted of dealing in narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. The conviction was affirmed, 319 F.2d 661 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 981, 84 S.Ct. 494, 11 L.Ed.2d 426 (1964).

While appellant was incarcerated in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ragan v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. Antranik ParoutianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lewis Grieco v. Larry Meachum, WardenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  2. Donald Croom Beatty, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Arcadio Maldonado GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. State v. CadenaWashington Supreme Court · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API