Legal Opinion

Banks v. Manchester

United States Circuit Court

Decided March 3, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Chancery. Hearing on bill and answer.

1Opinion of the CourtSage, J.

The complainants, partners under the style “Banks Brothers,” and law-book publishers at the city of New York, are contractors with the state of Ohio for the publication of forthcoming volumes 41 and 42, Ohio State Reports. They seek to enjoin the defendant, who is the proprietor and publisher at Columbus, Ohio, of the American Law Journal, from publishing therein any of the decisions and opinions of the judges of the supreme court of Ohio, or of the supreme court commission of Ohio, in cases which are to be reported in either of said volumes. It appears from the bill that, under arrangements…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. CallaghanUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
  2. Little v. GouldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1851
  3. Chase v. SanbornU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-operative Pub. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
  2. West Publishing Company v. Mead Data Central, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. West Publishing Company v. Mead Data Central, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API