Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
West Publishing Company v. Mead Data Central, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1986No. 85-5399Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOliver, Senior District Judge
This case pends on an interlocutory appeal noticed pursuant to Section 1292(a)(1) of Title 28, U.S.C., from a modified order of the district court which “preliminarily enjoined [MDC] from displaying, referencing or including the page number of any and all publications within plaintiff’s National Reporter System * * * published during the period from January 2, 1910 to the present within or in relation to the text of court opinions contained in the LEXIS database.” Addendum at 25a-26a.1
I concur in what the majority stated in regard to the procedural posture of the case and its discussion of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.