Legal Opinion

FHE Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1945No. 11167PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

A vigorous motion for rehearing, supported by an exhaustive brief, contends that the decision is wholly wrong, and especially that the cost of drilling the “dry hole” should have been deducted as an expense of business or as a loss realized. Upon an assertion that the whole oil producing business is affected by the argument of our opinion to the effect that the option to deduct the drilling cost of a successful well, as given by Regulation of the Treasury Department, is contrary to the statute and wholly void, we permitted briefs to be filed by thirty counsel for other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardesty v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Hunt v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of Goodall v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Harper Oil Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Exxon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  5. Sun Co. & Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API