Harper Oil Company, a Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.
We are concerned here with the issue whether a taxpayer’s cost of surface-casing for a producing Oklahoma oil well may be expensed, pursuant to § 263(c) 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the implementing regulation, or whether that cost must be capitalized and recovered only through depreciation. The taxpayer expresses the issue with a slightly different, but entirely appropriate, emphasis: “The single issue involved in this appeal is whether or not the option to expense drilling costs applies to non-salvageable surface-casing.” The taxpayer, Harper Oil…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Olympic Radio & Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United Telecommunications, Inc. (Formerly United Utilities, Incorporated) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Charles E. Moritz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Standard Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
- Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Keeler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.