Legal Opinion

Harper Oil Company, a Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1970No. 202-68_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.

We are concerned here with the issue whether a taxpayer’s cost of surface-casing for a producing Oklahoma oil well may be expensed, pursuant to § 263(c) 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the implementing regulation, or whether that cost must be capitalized and recovered only through depreciation. The taxpayer expresses the issue with a slightly different, but entirely appropriate, emphasis: “The single issue involved in this appeal is whether or not the option to expense drilling costs applies to non-salvageable surface-casing.” The taxpayer, Harper Oil…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Olympic Radio & Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United Telecommunications, Inc. (Formerly United Utilities, Incorporated) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. Charles E. Moritz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  4. Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  5. Keeler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API