Legal Opinion

State v. SWARD

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 19, 2010No. AC 31320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAV1NE, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained after his initial encounter with a state police trooper during a routine traffic stop. The defendant, Keith D. Sward, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction, rendered following a conditional plea of nolo contendere, of illegal operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. State v. DukesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. State v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BritoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. State v. ArokiumConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. State v. WilloughbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API