Gamlin v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.
The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled. Lowe v. State, 134 Ala. 154, 32 South. 273; Wooster v. State, 55 Ala. 217; Ex parte State, In re Brown, etc., 197 Ala. 419, 73 South. 35.
The plea of former jeopardy will not lie in a case of this character. U. S. v. Lanza et al., 43 Sup. Ct. 141, 67 L. Ed. 314; Gilbert v. State, ante, p. 104, 95 South. 502.
There is no error in the record. Let the judgment be affirmed.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Wooster v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peek v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Mason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Odom v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.