Legal Opinion

Gamlin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1923No. 7 Div. 882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled. Lowe v. State, 134 Ala. 154, 32 South. 273; Wooster v. State, 55 Ala. 217; Ex parte State, In re Brown, etc., 197 Ala. 419, 73 South. 35.

The plea of former jeopardy will not lie in a case of this character. U. S. v. Lanza et al., 43 Sup. Ct. 141, 67 L. Ed. 314; Gilbert v. State, ante, p. 104, 95 South. 502.

There is no error in the record. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Wooster v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peek v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Mason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Odom v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API