Legal Opinion

Finkbiner v. Clay County Kansas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 21, 1986No. 58,390PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Plaintiff drove his pickup truck over the end of a township road into a dry river bottom. He sued both the county and the township for injuries suffered, claiming they had failed to post proper warning signs. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants after determining that under the Kansas Tort Claims Act, K.S.A. 75-6101 et seq., they were immune from liability because the signing of a road was a discretionary function. K.S.A. 75-6104. The plaintiff appeals.

On February 5, 1982, plaintiff, Craig Finkbiner, was traveling…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Hampton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Carpenter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Toumberlin v. HaasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beck v. Kansas Adult AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Patterson v. Cowley County, KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. Scheufler v. General Host Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Phillips v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API