Maggio v. Florida, Department of Labor & Employment Security
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on the following:
1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Docket No. 3) and Plaintiffs response (Docket No. 5); and
2. Defendants’ supplement to their motion to dismiss (Docket No. 7), to which Plaintiff has made no response.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Plaintiffs complaint should not be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of her claim that would entitle her to relief. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kruger v. JenneDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
- Janet Maggio v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Janet Maggio v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000