Legal Opinion

Maggio v. Florida, Department of Labor & Employment Security

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 19, 1999No. 98-2473-CIV-T-17BPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on the following:

1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Docket No. 3) and Plaintiffs response (Docket No. 5); and

2. Defendants’ supplement to their motion to dismiss (Docket No. 7), to which Plaintiff has made no response.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Plaintiffs complaint should not be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of her claim that would entitle her to relief. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kruger v. JenneDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
  2. Janet Maggio v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Janet Maggio v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API