Legal Opinion

Doe v. Boston Scientific

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 6, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1082Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ex rel. BEN R. STOKES, ) ) Civil Action No. 11-1082 (ESH) Relator, ) ) FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT v. ) TO

31 U.S.C. §§ 3729

et. seq. ) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Ben R. Stokes filed this action on June 14, 2011, under to the False Claims Act,

31 U.S.C. §§ 3729, et seq. (“FCA”). Stokes alleges that defendants Boston Scientific, St. Jude Medical, Inc., and Medtronic,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. American Civil Liberties Union v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States Ex Rel. Durham v. Prospect Waterproofing, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Whistleblower 14106-10W v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API