Legal Opinion

Armour Fertilizer Works v. Parrish Vegetable & Fruit Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of error to .the Circuit Court for Manatee County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

— The Plaintiff in error recovered a judgment in the Circuit Court for Manatee County against the Parrish Vegetable and Fruit Company. Execution on the judgment issued against the corporation was duly returned nulla tona. Thereupon an execution was issued under Chapter 5892 Acts of 1909 against Henry L. Coe as one of the stockholders of the Parrish Vegetable and Fruit Company, a corporation, for an amount equal to the amount remaining unpaid upon the subscription of Henry L. Coe to the stock of said corporation, the execution against the corporation for *66its indebtedness having been returned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knight & Wall Co. v. Tampa Sand Lime Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. City of Clearwater v. State Ex Rel. United Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Black v. MoreeTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Williams & Nobbs, Inc. v. LeonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Florida · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API