Legal Opinion

Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 28, 1916Published

Writ of Error to 'Circuit Court, Manatee County; F. A. Whitney, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

Upon the return of the mandate of this court upon the former hearing of this case, subnomine Armour Fertilizer Works v. Parish Vegetable & Fruit Co., 63 Fla. 64, 58 South. Rep. 231, a judgment was entered denying the motion to quash the execution issued against Henry L. Coe, as a stockholder of the Vegetable Company, which had no assets whereon to levy. To this judgment Coe prosecutes his writ of error.

Coe does not claim that he was in fact a stockholder, nor that there remains no balance due upon his stock, nor seek to interpose any of the defenses pointed out as open to him upon the former…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armour Fertilizer Works v. Parrish Vegetable & Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API