Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Trimble

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 25, 1879PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrent, J.

This case arises under a decree of partition, passed by the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, on the 24th day of October, 1856, making division of the real estate owned in common by Samuel Trimble in his life-time, and a certain Andrew Flannigan. Samuel Trimble being dead at the time the proceedings were instituted, his interest had descended to his children as heirs-at-law, and they were made parties.

The estate was divided into two parts, designated as Division A, and Division B. Division A, was allotted to Andrew Flannigan, and Division B, to the heirs of Samuel Trimble.

The part allotted to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Magruder v. PeterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1840
  2. Owens v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  3. Bull v. PyleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  4. McCormick v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1830
  5. Darlington's AppropriationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Demuth v. Old Town BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  2. Baldwin v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  3. Curry v. Hillcrest Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Cunningham v. DavidoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Miller v. HorowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API