Legal Opinion
Harwood v. Senate Majority Fund, LLC
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 2006No. 05CA1925PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROMÁN, J.
In this administrative appeal concerning the Campaign and Political Finance Amendment, Colo. Const, art. XXVIII (the Amendment), and the Fair Campaign Practices Act, § 1-45-101, et seq., C.R.S.2005 (FCPA), complainant, David Harwood, appeals the Division of Administrative Hearings order entered in favor of defendant, Senate Majority Fund, LLC (SMF). We affirm.
SMF hired Vitale and Associates (V & A) to conduct a telephone opinion poll to gauge public opinion before the November 2004 election. When conveying poll results to its clients, V & A provides information regarding the chance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Evans v. RomerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Bruce v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sanger v. DennisColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Colorado Citizens for Ethics in Government v. Committee for American DreamColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Akin v. Four Corners EncampmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Alliance for Colorado's Families v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- McGihon v. CaveColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.