Legal Opinion
McIntyre v. Wick
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1996No. NonePublished
1Opinion of the Court
558 N.W.2d 347 (1996)
1996 SD 147
John McINTYRE, Plaintiff,
v.
Hal G. WICK, Defendant.
Douglas KAZMERZAK, Plaintiff,
v.
Arthur F. FRYSLIE, Defendant.
Nos. 19898, 19899.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Argued December 20, 1996.
Decided December 31, 1996.
Linda Lea M. Viken of Viken, Viken, Pechota, Leach & Dewell, Rapid City, for plaintiffs.
Scott N. Heidepriem of Johnson, Heidepriem, Miner & Marlow, Sioux Falls, for defendants.
MILLER, Chief Justice.
ACTION
[¶ 1] Plaintiffs John McIntyre (No. 19898) and Douglas Kazmerzak (No. 19899) filed separate petitions for writs of certiorari seeking our review of the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.