Legal Opinion
10 Employee Benefits Ca 1197, 10 Employee Benefits Ca 1203, 24 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1006 Charles Daniel v. Eaton Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 17, 1988No. 86-5664Published
1Opinion of the Court
839 F.2d 263
10 Employee Benefits Ca 1197,
10 Employee Benefits Ca 1203,
24 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1006
Charles DANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EATON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-5664.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued Dec. 4, 1987.
Decided Feb. 9, 1988.
On Motion for Reconsideration March 17, 1988.
Hollis L. Searcy, argued, Richard L. Masters, Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff-appellant.
John T. Ballantine, David A. Harris, Ogden, Robertson and Marshall, Louisville, Ky., Harry T. Quick, argued, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, Cleveland, Ohio, for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Daniel v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Leroy Ellenburg, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee. v. Brockway, Inc. & Spellman Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.