Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arrington v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 2009No. 60, September Term, 2008Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

BATTAGLIA, J.,

which GREENE, J., Joins.

I respectfully dissent because the majority reaches the merits of the case, although we never granted certiorari.

Arrington filed a “Motion to Reopen Postconviction Proceeding and For New Trial” pursuant to former Section 8-201 of the Criminal Procedure Article, Maryland Code (2001, 2008 Repl.Vol.),1 after a DNA test reflected that blood on clothing that he owned could not have come from the victim, alleging that he was entitled to a new trial for the crime of second degree murder for which he had been convicted because the jury was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Jourdan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API