Legal Opinion

Ulmann v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 18, 1913No. 923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 28343 (T. D. 32455).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case is designated by the term “coronation cord.” The special report of the appraiser states that it “consists *78of cotton cord used for trimming purposes known as coronation cord.” It was assessed for duty as cotton cord at 60 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 349 of the tariff act of 1909, the material part of which for the purposes of this case is as follows:

349. * * * Trimmings, braids, * * * bands, bandings, * * * cords, * * *; all of the foregoing, composed wholly or in chief value of cotton, flax, or other vegetable fiber, * * * and not elsewhere specially…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Ulmann & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Roeller-Struss Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API