Legal Opinion

Woods Irrigation Co. v. Department of Employment

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1958No. Sac. No. 6748Published

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff sought to recover certain unemployment insurance contributions assessed and paid under protest pursuant to the Unemployment Insurance Act. (Stats. 1935, ch. 352, p. 1226, as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8780d.) The assessments covered the period from January 1, 1946, through June 30, 1951. Plaintiff pursued all prescribed administrative remedies before bringing this action. Its claim of refund is based upon the ground that the irrigating and drainage services performed by its employees constitute “agricultural labor” and so are exempt from the coverage of the act. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. California Employment Commission v. Butte County Rice Growers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. California Employment Commission v. KovacevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Big Wood Canal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Irvine Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Chester C. Fosgate Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API