Commonwealth v. Mourar
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, President Judge:
This appeal is from an order suppressing evidence. The trial court ordered the evidence suppressed because it found that the search warrant was executed after 10 p.m. although the Commonwealth in the affidavit in support of the warrant did not request authority for a nighttime search, as required by Rule 2003(c) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure. We hold that despite the Commonwealth’s violation of Rule 2003(c), the evidence should not have been suppressed. The trial court’s order will therefore be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.
We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Rudolph Boyance v. David N. Myers, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. CampersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Commonwealth v. GentileSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. Camera, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1993