Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Wisconsin Desert Horse Ass'n

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1969No. 171PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The basic questions raised on the appeal by the state and the department are: (1) Is sec. 285.01, Stats., an enabling statute which permits a tort action to be brought against the state; (2) does sec. 895.43 permit a tort action to be brought against the state; and (3) is the nature of the department such that it is sui juris and may be sued independently of secs. 285.01 and 895.43?

1. The nature of see. 285.01, Stats.

The trial court in denying the motion for summary judgment took the view that sec. 285.01, Stats., was an enabling statute which provided a means by which a tort action might be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Metzger v. Wisconsin Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Houston v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Forseth v. SweetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. C.L. v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Marrapese v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API