Legal Opinion

Cook v. Trinity Universal of Kansas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1991No. 1900025PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Justice.

The plaintiff, Stanley Cook, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of *814the defendant, Trinity Universal of Kansas (hereinafter referred to as “Trinity”), on Cook’s bad faith claim. That summary judgment was made final pursuant to Rule 54(h), A.R.Civ.P.

On July 1, 1987, Cook’s motor vehicle, a 1985 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer, was stolen. Cook had a policy of insurance with Trinity covering the vehicle. The insurance policy provided that Trinity’s limit of liability for loss would be the lesser of the:

“1. Actual cash value of the stolen or damaged vehicle; or
“2. Amount…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. National Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. DuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Kizziah v. Golden Rule Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watters v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dairyland Insurance v. HermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ex Parte Norwood Hodges Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Ex Parte Norwood Hodges Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Watters v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API