Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex Parte Norwood Hodges Motor Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 3, 1996No. 1930150Published

1Concurrence

I dissented on original submission, stating that, in my judgment, the evidence was not "clear and convincing," as defined in Ala. Code 1975, § 6-11-20(b)(4), with respect to the fraud claims. However, after further examining the record and the briefs, and after indulging all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff, I have concluded that the evidence was sufficient to submit the punitive damages claim to the jury. The jury could have awarded punitive damages based on a finding that the defendant had intentionally defrauded the plaintiff by selling her a different and less expensive…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Big B, Inc. v. CottinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Donald v. City National Bank of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Hines v. Riverside Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API