Legal Opinion

Pennebacker v. Wayfarer Ketch Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-6472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

This is an action for wrongful discharge and defamation brought by a pilot formerly employed by defendant Wayfarer Ketch Corporation (“Wayfarer”). Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for, inter alia, lack of in personam jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). For the reasons stated below, I grant de fendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

I

Plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that the defendant has contacts sufficient with the forum state to provide in personam jurisdiction. Compagnie des Bauxites de…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romann v. Geissenberger Manufacturing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Friedman v. Israel Labour PartyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Failla v. FixtureOne Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Kristine Failla v. Fixtureone Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API