Legal Opinion

Failla v. FixtureOne Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 13, 2013No. 43405-9-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBjorgen, J.

¶1 Kenneth A. Schütz, president and chief executive officer of FixtureOne Corporation, appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss Kristine Failla’s claims against him for unpaid wages and other relief and the granting of Failla’s summary judgment motion on the same claims. Schütz argues that Washington State lacks personal jurisdiction over him because he does not have the requisite minimum contacts with the state and, even if Washington did have personal jurisdiction, that summary judgment was inappropriate because genuine issues of material fact are present. Concluding that Washington…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Failla v. FixtureOne Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Failla v. FixtureOne Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Failla v. FixtureOne Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Failla v. FixtureOne Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API