Legal Opinion
Royal Oak Entertainment, LLC v. City of Royal Oak
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 17, 2009No. 07-1904UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Royal Oak Entertainment, L.L.C. (“ROE”), Murray Hodgson, Royal Oak Theatre, LLC (“ROT”), Peter Hendrick-son, and New Promo, LLC, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal an award of attorney fees and costs in the amount of $29,772.50 against Plaintiffs and their counsel in favor of Defendants-Appellees, the City of Royal Oak, Michigan (“Royal Oak”), James Mar-cinkowski, Charles Semchena, and Rodney Keteyian (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs argue that the district court abused its discretion under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Bill Wayne Shepherd v. Billy WellmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wesco Ins. Co. v. Roderick Linton Belfance, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Scott v. SandersDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- Johnson v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental DisabilitiesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
- Wynn v. City of CovingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025