Legal Opinion

Hatton v. Moseley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 25, 1934No. 5 Div. 160PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The bill is to cancel and vacate a judgment at law in the circuit court.

The judgment was by default on personal service, shown by the official return, and recited in the judgment.

The equity of the bill is in its allegations that in fact no service was had on the defendant, complainant in this bill; that he had no knowledge of such suit, nor of the judgment rendered therein until after the lapse of thirty days from its rendition; that complainant had a good and valid defense to the demand sued upon, which defense is set forth in the bill.

The judgment at law, as shown by the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Evans v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Hendley v. ChabertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Gordon's Adm'r v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. Sims v. RigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Hauser v. Foley & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Riley v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Murphree v. International Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Fletcher v. First Nat. Bank of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API