Legal Opinion

(PC) Brady v. Jones

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 24, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00489Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PATRICK BRADY, No. 2:21-cv-00489 TLN AC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 SCOTT JONES, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

17 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The 18 undersigned found on screening that the initial complaint failed to state a viable claim for relief, 19 and plaintiff was granted leave to amend. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has now filed a First Amended 20 Complaint. ECF…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API