Legal Opinion
Amado v. City of Atlanta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 10, 1997No. A97A1544PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Karen Amado and Joel Cogdell d/b/a Onyx Productions International sued the City of Atlanta (“the City”), the City Attorney, members of the City Council, and Forrest Johnson (collectively “the defendants”) for alleged violations of the Georgia Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act (OCGA § 16-14-1 et seq.). The defendants moved the trial court to strike the complaint in its entirety pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-12 (f), and to order plaintiffs to redraft the complaint in compliance with OCGA § 9-11-8 (a) (2). The defendants also moved to disqualify plaintiffs’ counsel on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cherry v. Coast House, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Ewing Holding Corp. v. Egan-Stanley Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Lunsford v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Whatley v. Blue Cross of Georgia/Columbus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Islamkhan v. KhanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- FEIN Et Al. v. CHENAULT Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014