Legal Opinion

Ewing Holding Corp. v. Egan-Stanley Investments, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1980No. 59444, 59445PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

Motion to dismiss — Timeliness of appeal. This unusual and convoluted procedural quagmire, involves the following procedural developments. Plaintiff below, the Ewing Holding Corp., entered into a contract to sell an apartment complex to defendant below, Egan-Stanley Investments. Ackerman & Co. was the real estate broker handling the sale. Egan paid Ackerman $25,000 earnest money. Later Egan gave Ackerman a second $25,000 but Egan stopped payment on that check. Ewing in its contract of sale vouched that the apartment complex was zoned A-l, Apartment. In fact, part of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jordan v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Darden v. RavanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Sapp v. ABC Credit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Wood v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Cranman Insurance v. Wilson Marine Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. Cherry v. Coast House, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Leader National Insurance v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Jarrard v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Settendown Public Utility, LLC v. Waterscape Utility, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API