Ewing Holding Corp. v. Egan-Stanley Investments, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
Motion to dismiss — Timeliness of appeal. This unusual and convoluted procedural quagmire, involves the following procedural developments. Plaintiff below, the Ewing Holding Corp., entered into a contract to sell an apartment complex to defendant below, Egan-Stanley Investments. Ackerman & Co. was the real estate broker handling the sale. Egan paid Ackerman $25,000 earnest money. Later Egan gave Ackerman a second $25,000 but Egan stopped payment on that check. Ewing in its contract of sale vouched that the apartment complex was zoned A-l, Apartment. In fact, part of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jordan v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Darden v. RavanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Sapp v. ABC Credit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Wood v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Cranman Insurance v. Wilson Marine Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Cherry v. Coast House, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Leader National Insurance v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Jarrard v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Settendown Public Utility, LLC v. Waterscape Utility, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.