Legal Opinion

Mercantile Adjustment Agency v. Palmisano

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1925No. 10,085PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

Plaintiff alleges that it is the holder and owner of a promissory note for the sum of $290, dated November 8th, 1924 payable in installments* of $29 on the 8th day of each month, paraphed for identification with an act of chattel mortgage before Jos. A. Casey, Notary, of the same date; that defendant has paid oh account of said note $58, leaving a balance due of $232.

For exception the defendant alleged “that the paragraphs of plaintiff’s petition are not numbered as required by Act 228 of 1924” Sec. 1 p. 443 S. First; S — Sixth p. 446 of same Act provides:

“Every exception which may be filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Renshaw v. RichardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  2. Citizens' Bank v. BenachiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
  3. Lafrance v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865
  4. Osborne v. Powell & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1865

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Succession of GalianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Columbia Restaurant v. SadnovickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Iaccuzzo v. ColeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Achee v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Item Co. v. Community Burial Service Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API