Legal Opinion

Courtenay v. Randolph

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1972No. 46604, 46677, 46676, 46678PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

In these companion cases plaintiff filed

two-count complaints against the respective defendants. Count 1 alleged malicious prosecution and Count 2 false imprisonment. The trial court denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment as to Count 1 and granted their motions as to Count 2. We are treating these rulings in the reverse order.

1. (Count 2). If the plaintiff was arrested under a void warrant the action is for false imprisonment and if the warrant is valid malicious prosecution is the remedy. Smith v. Embry, 103 Ga. App. 375 (3) (119 SE2d 45); Lowe v. Turner, 115 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Lowe v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Clark v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Lovett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  3. Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. McCord v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Meyers v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API