Courtenay v. Randolph
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
In these companion cases plaintiff filed
two-count complaints against the respective defendants. Count 1 alleged malicious prosecution and Count 2 false imprisonment. The trial court denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment as to Count 1 and granted their motions as to Count 2. We are treating these rulings in the reverse order.
1. (Count 2). If the plaintiff was arrested under a void warrant the action is for false imprisonment and if the warrant is valid malicious prosecution is the remedy. Smith v. Embry, 103 Ga. App. 375 (3) (119 SE2d 45); Lowe v. Turner, 115 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Lowe v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Clark v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Lovett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- McCord v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Meyers v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.