Legal Opinion

Smith v. Embry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1961No. 38777PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

The petition is very loosely drawn and it does not appear upon what cause of action the plaintiff intended to declare. Nevertheless, if the petition states a cause of action under any theory, the general demurrer should have been overruled.

One of the deficiencies of this petition is that it fails to say for what offense the plaintiff was arrested. As to actions for malicious prosecution, “the declaration, petition, or complaint must affirmatively show that a judicial proceeding was instituted against plaintiff, and the original proceeding, including process, must be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Page v. Citizens Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Waters v. WinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Ellis v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Grist v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Gordon v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Hayes v. IrwinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  3. Walker v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. McCord v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Atlantic Zayre, Inc. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API