Legal Opinion
Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd. v. MISC Berhad
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 2010No. 08-57046PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
We consider whether the district court erred in vacating a maritime attachment.
Facts
Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services sues MISC Berhad for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. Equatorial, a supplier of marine fuel, claims MISC agreed to purchase over $22 million worth of bunker fuel — which is used to power ships — for vessels owned and operated by MISC. Equatorial delivered the bunkers to MISC through Grandeur Trading & Services, but MISC never paid Equatorial.
MISC says it never contracted with Equatorial. According to MISC, it entered into a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aqua Stoli Shipping Ltd. v. Gardner Smith Pty Ltd., Docket No. 05-5385-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- In Re De Laurentiis Entertainment Group Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Debtor. Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Vitol, S.A. v. Primerose Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- ProShipLine Inc. v. Aspen Infrastructures Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd. v. BerhadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- ProShipLine Inc. v. Aspen Infrastructures Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Proshipline Inc. v. Aspen Infrastructures Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.