Legal Opinion

Proshipline Inc. v. Aspen Infrastructures Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 2010No. 08-35337PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge BEEZER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-appellants ProShipLine, Inc. and EP-Team, Inc. appeal from two district court decisions in favor of defendantappellee Aspen Infrastructures Ltd. Both decisions involve a writ of maritime attachment that ProShipLine and EP-Team obtained against Aspen pursuant to Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule B”). The district court held in the first decision that it could not compel Aspen to post security…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Kolela Mpoyo v. Litton Electro-Optical SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alphamate Commodity GMBH v. CHS EUROPE SACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API