Legal Opinion
Gall v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 12, 1961No. Record 5248PublishedCited by 19 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtI’Anson, J.
The plaintiff, Mary D. Gall, filed a motion for judgment against the defendant, the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, to recover damages arising out of personal injuries claimed by her to have been received as a result of the negligence of the defendant while she was in its store as an invitee. A jury returned its verdict for the defendant, on which the trial court entered judgment, and the plaintiff is here on a writ of error.
The plaintiff assigns as error the granting of defendant’s instruction “D” on contributory negligence, and the admission of testimony relating to the “absence of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Knight v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Acme Markets., Inc. v. RemschelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Certified TV and Appliance Company v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Fout v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- Snyder v. GinnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- Colonial Stores Inc. v. PulleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Russo v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
- Tate v. RiceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Leonard Allen Gauldin v. Virginia Winn-Dixie, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.