Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Leo Farley

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 26, 1957No. Docket 24577PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon the remand of the case pursuant to our opinion of November 9, 1956, 238 F.2d 575, the court below assigned counsel to assist the defendant-appellant in the preparation and prosecution of a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and, after consideration of the motion thus submitted, denied the same and certified that the appeal was not taken in good faith.

The appellant now, through counsel appointed as above stated, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and for an extension of time to file the record, requesting a hearing before the court en banc. The hearing en banc is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. George JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. Charles Leo FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Farley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Charles Leo FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API