Legal Opinion
In Matter of CAP
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1976No. 9365Published
1Opinion of the Court
359 A.2d 11 (1976)
In the Matter of C. A. P.
No. 9365.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
June 16, 1976.
Before REILLY, Chief Judge, and KELLY, FICKLING, KERN, GALLAGHER, NEBEKER, YEAGLEY, HARRIS and MACK, Associate Judges.
ORDER
On consideration of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed by counsel for C.A.P. and of the responsive pleadings filed with respect thereto, it is
ORDERED that the aforesaid petition is denied.
2Per curiam
Associate Judges FICKLING, GALLAGHER and HARRIS would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
ADDENDUM TO OPINION
KELLY, Associate Judge:
The petition for rehearing…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- L. C. Collins and Lucille Collins, His Wife Earl Schneider and Mildred Schneider, His Wife v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Louis Safarik and Richard P. Desmet v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Raymond J. Hansen v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Samuel Gary v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, John J. King v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Robert Schulein v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Betty J. Lewis v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Duncan Miller v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Roebuck v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.