Legal Opinion

Labarbe v. . Ingle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Affirmed on authority of McDonald v. Howe, 178 N. C.,. 257, 100 S. E., 427, Pfeifer v. Drug Co., 171 N. C., 214, 88 S. E., 343, Knowles v. Savage, 140 N. C., 372, 52 S. E., 930, Thompson v. Peebles, 85 N. C., 418.

Speaking to a similar situation in Ferrell v. Hales, 119 N. C., 199, 25 S. E., 821, Clark, J., observed: “The judge could not set aside the-verdict rendered at the previous term; and if he could not enter judgment upon the facts found by the jury by their recorded verdict, the matter would have been forever suspended, like Mahomet’s coffin.

‘In Aladdin’s tower

Some unfinished window…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. . HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. McDonald v. . HoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Knowles v. Savage.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Long v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Bright v. . SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API