Legal Opinion

United States v. Sergio Rafael Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1992No. 92-50268PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On June 1, 1992, appellee moved to dismiss this appeal on the basis that appellant *1038had waived his right to appeal under the provisions of a plea agreement. On June 26, 1992, a panel of this court ordered appellant to submit a statement of the issues he intended to raise on appeal and to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. See United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318 (9th Cir.1990).

In his response, appellant contends, among other issues, that the government breached the plea agreement by opposing a two-level reduction in sentencing for acceptance of responsibility.

If…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. James Lynn HootonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Robert GorozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Fulvio Desantiago-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Jomar Michlin, United States of America v. Rahsaan WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Sergio Rafael GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Donald Bogusz, A/K/A Bogey, United States of America v. John O'rourke, A/K/A HapCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ollie JOHNSON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. William H. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API