United States v. Sergio Rafael Gonzalez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On June 1, 1992, appellee moved to dismiss this appeal on the basis that appellant *1038had waived his right to appeal under the provisions of a plea agreement. On June 26, 1992, a panel of this court ordered appellant to submit a statement of the issues he intended to raise on appeal and to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. See United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318 (9th Cir.1990).
In his response, appellant contends, among other issues, that the government breached the plea agreement by opposing a two-level reduction in sentencing for acceptance of responsibility.
If…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. James Lynn HootonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert GorozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Fulvio Desantiago-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Jomar Michlin, United States of America v. Rahsaan WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Sergio Rafael GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Donald Bogusz, A/K/A Bogey, United States of America v. John O'rourke, A/K/A HapCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ollie JOHNSON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. William H. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.