Legal Opinion

Durant v. Corbin

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington

Decided May 22, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This was a suit in equity to adjudicate conflicting rights in mining claims on the public lands.

1Opinion of the Court

HANFORD, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity, brought under section 2326, Rev. St. U. S., in support of the complainant’s adverse claim, filed in the United States land office at Spokane, against the application of the defendant for a patent for Sheep Creek placer claim. The complainant claims, by purchase from the locators thereof, the Lost Axe and Clifford mining claims, each containing 20 acres, which are within the boundaries of Sheep Creek placer claim, containing 160 acres, located by a company of eight persons, seven of whom have executed deeds conveying their rights to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bigbee & Warrior Rivers Packet Co. v. Mobile & O. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riverside Sand & Cement Manufacturing Co. v. HardwickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Nome & Sinook Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  3. Rixford Manufacturing Co. v. Town of HighgateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API