Legal Opinion

Torrance v. Torrance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1946No. 30607PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaut, J.

The defendant makes incidental claims that the plaintiff was not entitled to a reversal of the judgment of the trial court by the Court of Appeals on the grounds that he did nbt make any offer to prove an essential issue in his action for divorce, namely, that he was and had been for at least 30 days a bona fide resident of Summit county and had been a resident of the state for at least one year before filing his petition; that he did not proffer any evidence sufficient to sustain any statutory ground for divorce; and that he did not offer or proffer any evidence to rebut the case made by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muskeget Island Club v. Inhabitants of NantucketMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. OliverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Savage v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Goehring v. DillardOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Old Silver Beach Corp. v. Inhabitants of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Hackett (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Hawkey v. WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Vincenzo v. NewhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Philpot v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. In re ReneeOhio Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API