Legal Opinion
Baez v. Astrue
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 6, 2009No. Civil Action 07-30075-KPNPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES (Document No. 18)
NEIMAN, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is Blanca Baez (“Plaintiff’)’s application for attorney’s fees, amounting to $4,137.01, under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Plaintiff claims that she is entitled to such fees as the result of this court’s April 29, 2008 order reversing the administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”) — which decision had denied Plaintiff Social Security…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Schock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Franklin M. YoffeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pagan Ex Rel. A.C. v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- COYNE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONERDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
- SCOTT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONERDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023