Legal Opinion

COYNE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 18, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00327Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE KEVIN C., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 2:22-cv-00327-NT ) MARTIN O’MALLEY, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant.1 ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT The Plaintiff, through counsel, requests an award of fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). EAJA Appl. for Fees and Expenses (ECF No. 28). The Defendant opposes the request on the grounds that the Commissioner’s position was substantially justified (ECF No. 30). For…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API