Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the University
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
Once again the Court is required to consider the impact of New York’s motion picture licensing law upon First Amendment liberties, protected by the Fourteenth Amendment from infringement by the States. Cf. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U. S. 495.
The New York statute makes it unlawful “to exhibit, or to sell, lease or lend for exhibition at any place of amusement for pay or in connection with any business in the state of New York, any motion picture film or reel *685[with certain exceptions not relevant here], unless there is at the time in full force and effect a valid license or permit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by291 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.