Legal Opinion
Giffin v. Ensign
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 4681PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motion of defendants John B. Ensign and George F. Burnett Company, Inc., to quash the return of services of summons and to dismiss the action under Rule 12 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.
The case involves an automobile accident in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, which is in this District. The plaintiffs, husband and wife, are residents of said Huntingdon County. The complaint alleges that defendant Ensign is a resident of Indiana, defendant Burnett “is a corporation domiciled in the State of Indiana,” defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- McCoy v. SilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Olberding v. Illinois Cent. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Giffin v. EnsignCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Pasternack v. DaloDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Holbrook v. CafieroDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Berkey v. Rockwell Spring & Axle CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Rilling v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.