Legal Opinion
Ridenour v. Bank of America, N.A.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided May 22, 2014No. Case No. 13-cv-0317-BLWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 4)
RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Introduction
Stephen and Vickey Ridenour sued several companies connected to their residential mortgage. Those companies have moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 4. The court reviewed the complaint and the briefs and held oral argument on May 8, 2014. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Background
The Ridenours borrowed $553,000 to buy a home on the Spokane River near Post Falls, Idaho, in 2005. Doc. 1 at ¶ 8. Three years later…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shaw v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Bank of America, N.A. v. KuleszaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Tahmisian v. Netacent, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2024