Legal Opinion

Diker v. City of St. Louis Park

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1964No. 38,977Published

1Opinion of the Court

268 Minn. 461 (1964)

130 N.W. (2d) 113

BRUCE DIKER, A MINOR, BY LOUIS DIKER, HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, AND ANOTHER

v.

CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK.

No. 38,977.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 17, 1964.

Cragg & Barnett, for appellant.

Dorfman, Rudquist, Jones & Ramstead, for respondents.

SHERAN, JUSTICE.

The appeal is from an order of the district court denying defendant's alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

On February 6, 1959, Bruce Diker, then 10 years of age, sustained serious personal injury when hit near the eye by a puck while playing hockey at a public…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Modec v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Nicol v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API