Legal Opinion
ERHAL Holding Corp. v. Rusin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1998PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered July 29, 1997, which, inter alia, denied its motion to direct the defendants to pay postjudgment interest.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
*474In an order dated November 13, 1995, the Supreme Court determined that the plaintiff, ERHAL Holding Corp. (hereinafter ERHAL), was entitled to recover the sum of $39,947.52 from the defendants in full satisfaction of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rochester Carting Co. v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Juracka v. FerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Ariola v. Petro Trucking Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- ERHAL Holding Corp. v. RusinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by15 opinions
- Matra Building Corp. v. KuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Purpura v. PurpuraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Greenberg v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Liberatore v. Olivieri DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Retirement Accounts, Inc. v. Pacst Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.